Frage zu Glücksspiel-Websites mit Curaçao-Lizenz, die einen falschen Händlerkategoriecode verwenden (Seite 132)

I say like Leonardo in "Wolf of Wallstreet"

"Im not f*cking leaving!" 🥳🥳🥳🤟

Jag säger som Leonardo i "Wolf of wallstreet"

"Im not f*cking leaving!" 🥳🥳🥳🤟

I uploaded the documents but they were removed!!

I haven’t been paid anything to silence people. I was passing on the message I received which clearly shows that this thread is illegal.

some of you claim to not care but I promise you will if they contact you directly.

Hej!

Digikey, Budapest = digikeyboard.com

Feastingmen.com/amegagame.com , both same company (you can find their mail on the websites) , thats all it says on my transactions🙂

🤡

What is illegal. Can you explain? I'm curious and probably many more.

there is no law that says you can't defame companies.

the only thing that could have been illegal here is if we started sharing names of people who work at companies etc.. we have questioned their way of processing transactions. These methods they use are strictly prohibited. Then if you now post something about a company that does it the way it should be done, for example zimpler, trustly and these open banking, then it's a completely different matter.

Vad är det som är illegalt. Kan du förklara? Jag är nyfiken och säkert många fler.

det finns ingen lag som säger att du inte får förtala företag.

det enda som hade kunnat vara illegalt här är om vi började dela namn på personer som jobbar på företag osv.. vi har ifrågasatt deras sätt att processa transaktioner. Dessa metoder dom använder är strikt förbjudna. Sen om du nu la upp något om just ett företag som sköter det som man ska göra, dom tex zimpler,trustly och dessa open banking då är det en helt annan sak.

Then e kinta could start again🤣

Då e kinta kunte igång igen🤣

Basically admitting on here to gambling but then claiming to not receive goods is an illegal offence. They are saying that we are capitalising on both playing with the funds and then getting money back. Also by us getting other people involved it makes it more serious as it’s a fraudulent scheme.

this is what they are telling me. I perfectly understand people wanting to keep their posts on here but it’s not worth it for me to do so receiving the threat.

Hello everyone,

I wanted to address the recent post claiming that a user received a legal threat from a individual user and suggesting that we remove our discussions about refund requests. While it’s important to take any potential legal matters seriously, there are a few points that need clarification:

• Lack of Evidence: The user has not provided any concrete evidence of the legal letter they claim to have received. Without seeing the actual document, it’s difficult to assess the validity of the claim.

• No Specifics Provided: The post mentions that what we are doing is "actually illegal" but does not specify what exact actions or discussions are considered illegal. For us to take appropriate steps, we need clear information on what legal grounds are being cited.

• Public Discussions and Consumer Rights: Discussing consumer experiences, including issues with payments and potential refunds, is a crucial aspect of consumer protection and transparency. We have the right to seek advice and share our experiences with these companies, especially if we believe there have been unethical practices.

I did post the email but it was removed!!!

Of course they do. People on here are contact Noda to try and get refunds from Santeda!! They shouldn’t be contacting Noda.

Yes, those who have done this will be charged with fraud. Myself and the majority of this forum acted in accordance with the law and announced that

1. the money went to the casino
2. manipulation of the merchant code enabled the deposit, if the merchant code had not been manipulated, the transaction would never have occurred.
3. manipulation of merchant code is against the law
4. MCC codes are part of a regulatory system that ensures that payment transactions are handled appropriately and ethically. Using the wrong code is a breach of contract.

1. **Breach of contract:** Using the wrong MCC code can result in breach of contract with your payment processor and credit card companies, which can result in fines or even account closure.

2. **Penalties:** Credit card companies and payment processors may impose a penalty on merchants who fraudulently use the wrong MCC code.

3. **Loss of Trust:** Using the wrong code can undermine the trust between the merchant and their payment processor.

In summary, a merchant should not change their MCC code themselves, instead they should work with their payment processor and credit card companies to ensure that their business is correctly classified.

Kyllä ne jotka ovat tehneet näin täyttää petos syytteen. Itse ja suurin osa tältä foorumilta toimivat lakia noudattaen ja ilmoittivat että

1. raha meni kasinolle
2. kauppiaskoodin manipulointi mahdollisti talletuksen jos kauppiaskoodia ei olisi manipuloitu tapahtumaa ei olisi koskaan syntynyt.
3. kauppiaskoodin manipulointi on lainvastaista
4.  MCC-koodit ovat osa sääntelyjärjestelmää, joka varmistaa, että maksutapahtumat käsitellään asianmukaisesti ja eettisesti. Väärän koodin käyttö on sopimusrikos.

1. **Sopimusrikkomukset:** Väärän MCC-koodin käyttö voi johtaa sopimusrikkomuksiin maksuprosessorin ja luottokorttiyhtiöiden kanssa, mikä voi johtaa sakkoihin tai jopa tilin sulkemiseen.

2. **Sanktiot:** Luottokorttiyhtiöt ja maksuprosessorit voivat asettaa sanktiota kauppiaille, jotka käyttävät väärää MCC-koodia vilpillisesti.

3. **Luottamuksen Menetys:** Väärän koodin käyttö voi heikentää luottamusta kauppiaan ja heidän maksuprosessorinsa välillä.

Yhteenvetona, kauppias ei saa muuttaa MCC-koodiaan itse, vaan heidän tulee toimia yhteistyössä maksuprosessorinsa ja luottokorttiyhtiöiden kanssa varmistaakseen, että heidän liiketoimintansa on oikein luokiteltu.

So just leave the thread if you are that bothered after receiving scaremongering contact.

You are now attempting to shut down a forum thread that has and is continuing to highlight the illegal/criminal tactics that these organised crime gangs behind these fake/scam websites are using.

I’m not surprised they are trying to get this thread removed as can’t believe it’s taken them so long. Clearly it’s now hitting them financially so they have to do something.